(Still-Powerful-Today) Bill Moyers, LBJ'S #1 AIDE: "Get That God-damned bubble [top] off unless it's pouring rain."

Photos #1 & #2: Look carefully, and you'll see the back window of the Presidential Limo's "bubble top" is surrounded with a vinyl cover --

making an accurate shot from the rear difficult,
if not impossible...the "bubble top" is well-covered overhead, as well....this is what Bill Moyers did NOT want!

PHOTO #2:.... Kennedy's limo had a totally 'clear' bubble top such as in this photo ...and jfk CAN BE SEEN RIDING IN THIS LIMO WITH ITS CLEAR BUBBLE TOP. However, THE 'BUBBLE TOP' WAS COVERED WITH A DARK VINYL FABRIC ON NOV. 22 --SEE PHOTO #1-- AT PARKLAND HOSPITAL, EFFECTIVELY HIDING A VIEW OF THE CAR'S INTERIOR --AND MAKING IT HARD TO SEE THE FRONT ENTRY HOLE IN THE WINDSHIELD FROM THE REAR! THAT WINDSHIELD WAS QUICKLY REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A 'NEW' WINDSHIELD THAT HAD JUST A CRACK IN IT! SEE STORY, BELOW.

AN OUTRIGHT LIE IS STILL BEING BROADCAST BY THE MEDIA --THAT KENNEDY ORDERED THE BUBBLE-TOP -- WHICH COULD HAVE SAVED THE PRESIDENT --OFF HIS CAR ON THAT DIRE NOVEMBER MORNING, NOVEMBER 22, 1963, IN DALLAS.

BUT NOW THE JFK ASSASSINATION FORUM HAS POSTED SOME IMPORTANT POINTS ABOUT KENNEDY'S LIMO --AND WHO REALLY ORDERED THE 'BUBBLE TOP' OFF--LBJ AID BILL MOYERS! --MOYERS IS STILL ALIVE --AND POWERFUL. HIS WAS ONE OF THE LOUD VOICES DEMANDING THAT 'THE LOVE AFFAIR,' ';'THE GUILTY MEN' AND 'THE SMOKING GUNS' HAD TO BE BANNED--OR ELSE HE'D SUE THE HISTORY CHANNEL!-- READ HERE HOW MOYERS ORDERED THE 'G-D BUBBLE TOP' TO BE REMOVED FROM KENNEDY'S LIMO!

March 21, 2011, 01:15:34 PM JFK ASSASSINATION FORUM POSTS

"The oft repeated statements that security was stripped and reduced at JFK's orders because he didn't want SS agents or motorcycles blocking the view of the crowd and that he also requested the removal of the "bubble top" for the same reasons are patently false as researcher Vince Palamara has documented. Palamara "has stated that the usual array of motorcycles was four abreast of the limousine, with one placed at each fender; on many occasions there were twelve to eighteen motorcycles near the limousine. He also maintained that Gerald Behn, the head of the White House Detail, and Floyd Boring (second in command) both assured him that JFK never vetoed or modified any Secret Service protection and that any claims to the contrary were incorrect."

"The "bubble-top" had been removed from the presidential limousine at Love Field, as requested by Bill Moyers, LBJ's long-time past and future aide." "Moyers had been on the phone to Ms. Harris, informing her that the President did not want the bubble top. He told Harris to "get that God-damned bubble off unless it's pouring rain." "Moyers was not JFK's assistant . . . he was of course, actually one of Lyndon Johnson's longtime assistants." This is all documented in Phillip F. Nelson's "LBJ - The Mastermind of JFK's Assassination". Nelson goes on to state that "such gratuitous profanity by an ordained Baptist minister (Moyers) is a little odd in the context of this situation, considering that it had been raining all morning. It begs the question of whether Moyers was the real initiator of the request, or whether he was simply passing on a demand from his boss, LBJ, known to be habitually profane and strident in practically all situations (a general exception existed whenever cameras were near, of course, in which case a broad smile replaced his scornful gaze. All things considered, it can be assumed that Moyers was merely mouthing words originally screamed by Lyndon B. Johnson, in comparable stridency."
"...The term "bubble-top" became widely used to describe the removable top apparently because it was made mostly of plastic, even though the connotation of the term was that the top resembled a bubble. In fact, the top was much more than a clear "bubble" over a big convertible; it was a very formal design with a vinyl covering, which transformed the convertible into a limousine with a very small rear window. As such, it would make it nearly impossible for a sniper to see the occupants clearly enough to aim at any of them from above."

"The first photograph, Exhibit CE 345 of the Warren Report, shows the actual top that was carried in the car's trunk; the second shows it installed shortly after it arrived at Parkland Hospital... the black vinyl covering would obviously have made it impossible for anyone to have a reasonably clear shot at JFK."

(all quotes are from Phillip F. Nelson’s “LBJ – The Mastermind of JFK’s Assassination” (pub. 2010) )

"...The bubble top [had a] vinyl covering added on, which covers up all of the bubble top

(when installed) except for that narrow window at the back ... the bubble top with the

vinyl cover [was] added at Parkland Hospital... I have seen a picture of all of the parts of

the bubble top including the vinyl cover laid out on the ground to show how all of the

pieces go together."

"... In case one wonders why they would add the bubble top with vinyl

cover at Parkland, after Kennedy had already been shot and the limousine would no

longer be in use, I would conjecture that it was added to reduce the view of the interior of

the car from witnesses hanging around outside the entrance to the hospital where the

limousine was parked initially. At that point the interior of the car would still have blood

stains and the bullet hole through the front windshield (from front to back according to a

number of witnesses) as well as the indentation in the chrome that is believed to be the

result of a bullet from behind. This installation of the vinyl covered bubble top would help

to reduce the number of witnesses who could see the bullet hole in the windshield. One

of the witnessess who did manage to see the hole in the windshield was remarking upon

it when a SS agent overheard her and got in the car and immediately drove it out of sight

of those other witnesses hanging around outside the hospital."

"Several days after the car was returned to the White House garage and cleaned up [on]

orders from LBJ, (thus destroying evidence) the car was shipped off to the Ford Motor

Company's Rouge Plant in Detroit, Michigan where glass technicians removed the

windshield with the bullet hole in it and used that windshield as a template to make a new

windshield which was then installed to replace the one with the bullet hole. The

supervisor at the plant witnessed the original windshield and stated that "the windshield

had a bullet hole in it, Coming from the outside through." He further stated that "it was a

good clean bullet hole, right straight through from the front. And you can tell, when the

bullet hits the windshield, like when you hit a rock or something, what happens? The

back chips out and the front may just have a pinhole in it . . . this had a clean round hole

in the front and was fragmented in the back." When asked what happened to the original

windshield, the supervisor stated, "We scrapped it, we broke it up and scrapped it." That

supervisor's name was George Whitaker, Sr. and he passed away in 2001. He also

stated that he saw the limousine and the original windshield in the shop on Monday

morning November 25th, 1963. Other witnesses who saw the windshield at the Parkland

Hospital and describe seeing a through and through bullet hole in the windshield include

"Richard Dudman, Stavis Ellis, H. R. Freeman, and Dr. Evalea Galnges." "Secret Service

agent Charles Taylor told the truth too., in 1963 in his written report -- before the

pressure got to him and he recanted in his HSCA affidavit." Subsequently a crack was

added to the new windshield to further muddy the waters and cause confusion and

cast doubt about the statements of those who had seen an actual hole through the

original windshield." All quotes are from Douglas P. Horne's five volume work, "Inside the

Assassination Records Review Board" (pub 2010) (pgs 1439 - 1445).

Films of Lee Oswald--the Martin Shackelford Film List

Marina Oswald was interviewed by Jack Anderson years ago...this video reveals that Lee expressed admiration for Kennedy even in the USSR.



Witnesses have gone on film who knew Lee,as well...



Though Marina -- and I -- can be seen on film, speaking for him, Lee is dead. we only have what has been preserved --and often edited. I have noticed that still photos were often retouched, including a 'smirk' after his arrest in Dallas that I cannot find in any live films. Live films are harder to retouch, though we have evidence that this occurred in the Zapruder film.

Below is one of the films available on YouTube, plus a useful list created by researcher Martin Shackelford that can serve as a base to search on YouTube for some more. Most are still not available on YouTube. As part of Lee's biographical information, these films serve as a good base when trying to separate Lee from imposters.

While Lee told me he knew of impersonators, he welcomed them as serving to protect his true activities. But that backfired in November, 1963. Today some people believe that an individual named "Harvey" and an individual named "Lee" existed as two distinct entities. For many reasons, I believe this theory overextends the truth. Many false tips and faked records have obscured the true Lee Oswald from being understood.it is my hope that everyone reading this blog will read ME & LEE to truly understand the real Lee H. Oswald.



A Good Collection of Extant Films of Lee Harvey Oswald

The Oswald Films: An Outline
by Martin Shackelford



The Oswald Films:An Outline by Martin Shackelford (July 1993)
[updated 4-25-96]
Pre-Assassination. Speculative Films

There may exist presently unknown footage of several types which show Lee Harvey Oswald. One possible type is home movie footage, taken either by members of the
Oswald family, or by relatives, or by people who knew Lee Oswald
(schoolmates and their families, Civil Air Patrol cadets, etc.). A second possible type is home movie footage taken when Oswald was abroad, by tourists on the 2 ships, in Europe or in the Soviet Union or Mexico, or by people who knew him in the Soviet Union (there may be families in possession of such footage who have no idea Oswald is even in it; the Monica Kramer photos of Oswald in the Soviet Union turned up only after an intensive search of tourist photos taken during the relevant time period). A third possible type is footage shot covertly by or for the KGB, the CIA or other intelligence organizations.1.

1. The Home Movie (11-22-62)
In one of the many ironic twists in this case, the
first known motion picture footage of Lee Harvey Oswald was taken one year to the day before the Kennedy Assassination. It was a home movie taken by his brother Robert Oswald's wife Vada when the family gathered that year to celebrate Thanksgiving. Two color frames published in the October 17, 1967 LOOK Magazine excerpt from Robert's book show a smiling Lee Oswald seated on a couch near his half-brother John Pic and Pic's wife, with Marina standing near Lee, and Robert playing with his sons on the floor in the foreground. The two frames are also available from The Collector's Archives (Box 2, Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T6). On November 26, 1990, the film was shown on "Hard Copy," a tabloid television show featuring an interview with Robert Oswald, under the title "Oswald's Home
Movie." This may also be available on video from The Collector's
Archives.

==update: YOUTUBE: Robert Oswald's film is shown almost in is entirety here. Robert has always stated that his brother killed Kennedy. He was compromised, however, in many ways,especially how he is linked to the camera that is linked to the infamous backyard photos. My conclusion is that Robert Oswald said what he HAD to say about his brother, due to his involvement with marina and the fact that his brother's supposed deed could ruin his life. I, myself, have suffered for speaking the truth. Robert's TRUE feelings may be hinted at when he says he kissed his brother goodbye as he lay in the coffin. The look on his face displays, I believe, his heart.



THE LOVE AFFAIR AND OTHER BANNED HISTORY CHANNEL FILMS SOWING LEE:
Go to http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com to view.


2. The New Orleans films
Oswald's activities in New Orleans attracted the attention of both tourists and a professional cameraman.

2a. The Jack Martin Film (8-9-63)
In another of those aforementioned ironic twists, a tourist named Jack Martin was in Dallas in August 1963. His film records his view from the airplane. Next, he visits General Edwin Walker, under whom he had served, allegedly target of an assassination attempt by Lee Oswald in April of that year. The film documents the scene of that attempt: the window through which the shot was fired, the bullet hole, and the wall from behind which it was most likely fired, ending with shots of Walker's flag and mailbox, and a nearby building under construction (allegedly also photographed by Oswald prior to the attempt!) . Then we see the entrance to a movie theater, cypress trees, a seal at the edge of a pool, and the statue of Andrew Jackson in Lafayette Park in New Orleans.
Aroused by a commotion on Canal Street, Martin crossed to see what was happening, and began filming. We see Lee Oswald, leaflets in hand, standing on the sidewalk, being harangued by anti-Castro militants including Carlos Bringuier. Four police officers are seen arriving. The film ends with a view of the yellow leaflets scattered on the sidewalk after Bringuier knocked them out of Oswald's hands, and a brief aerial view of a subdivision. Parts of the film have only been used, to my knowledge, on the French television documentary, "Le Mystere Kennedy."

The documentary is available on video, and frames from the film as well,from The Collector's Archives. A still from this film was finally published in Robert Groden's 1995 book, The Search for Lee Harvey Oswald, an essential photo archive on Oswald.

2b. The James Doyle Film (8-9-63)
James Doyle was a 16 year old teenager, visiting
New Orleans with his family in early August 1963. His film begins in Lafayette Park, New Orleans, and includes a view of the Andrew Jackson statue. He, too, then noticed a commotion along Canal Street, crossed over to investigate, and began filming. Lee Oswald, back to the camera,is talking with Carlos Bringuier, when a police officer arrives, pushes Bringuier aside, and talks with Oswald, who gestures. Oswald is then seen through the crowd, under arrest, obscured, moving to the left, and we see him and the officer at curbside. The film ends with harbor views. To my knowledge, this film has only appeared in one television program, the British "Dispatches: The Day the Dream Died," available (as are frames)
from The Collector's Archives or from All That Video (405 Hopkins Court,North Wales PA 19434, phone (213) 361-1365.) A still from this film was also first published in the 1995 Groden book.

2c. The Johann Rush Films (8-12 & 16-63)
Johann Rush was a news cameraman for WDSU-TV in New Orleans in the August of 1963. He was on hand on August 12 when Lee Oswald appeared at the New Orleans courthouse for sentencing after his August 9 arrest. Rush filmed Oswald's approach, then Oswald posed for the camera in a courthouse corridor. The footage also includes Carlos Bringuier and the Cubans. Rush next filmed Oswald's
leafleting at the International Trade Mart on August 16. This is the
footage which shows Oswald and two colleagues (one of them Charles Steele Jr.) distributing leaflets, a figure in the background alleged to be Clay Shaw, and two foreground figures alleged to be Charles Rogers and Chauncey Holt. I won't attempt to catalog the sources in which bits of this footage appears, although the videotape "The Two Kennedys" (MPI Home Video, 1-800-323-0442, may still carry this title, or try The Collector's Archives) is a good source, and stills from the footage appear in many places.

2d. The WWL-TV Film (8-16-63)
The most famous still, however, is from a brief bit of footage also taken during the August 16 leafleting, but by a rival cameraman for WWL-TV named Mike O'Connor, and shows Oswald thrusting a leaflet toward a passerby. Captioned "Garner Deposition Exhibit 1," it appears in the Warren Report, and the footage is used in various documentaries.

2e. The Mike Lala Film (8-21-63)
The final bit of New Orleans footage was taken by cameraman Mike Lala during an interview of Oswald at WDSU-TV on August 21. It shows Oswald in left profile as he
speaks. In the semi-fictional film "Executive Action"(1973, National General Pictures, Warner Home Video),, the footage is used as a training film for an Oswald impostor. As with the other New Orleans TV footage, it is widely excerpted. The Collector's Archives offers two frames from the film.

Post-Assassination

3. The Ron Reiland Film (11-22-63)
WFAA-TV cameraman Ron Reiland was filming at the site of the Tippit
shooting when police were called to the Texas Theater, and Reiland went with them. As a result, he got the only footage of Oswald's arrest. One dimly lit scene shows Oswald being held by police inside the Texas Theater (underexposed, this appears only on "The Kennedy Tapes," which contains the complete Reiland footage, and on "Films From the Sixth Floor" videotape, which includes the films from the Dallas Book Depository exhibits). He then photographed Oswald being led out, placed into a police car, and driven away.

4. The Arrival Film (11-22-63)
An NBC cameraman filmed Oswald when he arrived at Dallas Police
headquarters, and was led into the Homicide Division offices, past
witness and co-worker Billy Lovelady.

5. The "Press Conference" Films (11-22-63)
Various footage exists from the late-night showing
of Oswald to the press, and this is some of the best-known footage of Oswald in custody. After the video ends on one film, the audio track continues with Oswald's voice for a short time longer.

6. The Hallway Films (11-22 to 24-63)
Soon, the Dallas Police Department
hallways were swarming with reporters and cameramen. There is footage of Oswald being led from room to room at Police Headquarters taken by ABC, NBC, CBS, local stations, and foreign cameramen. This includes the footage of Oswald's various denials: "I didn't shoot anybody, no sir." "I don't know what you people have been told, but I emphatically deny these charges." his statement that this was all happening "because I lived in the Soviet Union," etc. A great many of these films are included in the series "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" (Time-Life Video). There is also Hearst newsreel footage of Oswald in the hallway.

7. The Shooting Films (11-24-63)
ABC footage shows Oswald being led off the
jail elevator, and through the jail office area. Another piece of footage shows Oswald from behind as he moves out toward newsmen in the jail basement. Then a number of cameras (including the three networks and Hearst newsreel) captured him from the front as he is led out, and Jack Ruby lunges forward and shoots him. He is then out of the scene briefly. Most of this footage is also widely available.

8. The Post-Shooting Films (11-24-63)
When the ambulance arrives, Oswald is brought out on a stretcher, and loaded into it. We see Oswald inside as the ambulance
drives away. We next see footage of the ambulance arriving at Parkland Hospital with Oswald, Oswald being pulled out on the stretcher, and rushed into the hospital. This is the last known footage of Oswald alive, as well as the last publicly available. It is widely available.

9. The Exhumation Autopsy Videotape (10-4-81)
Lee Oswald's body was exhumed
on October 4, 1981 at the request of British author Michael Eddowes, with the cooperation of Marina Oswald and over the objections of Robert Oswald. A partial autopsy was performed at Baylor Pathology Laboratories, and the procedure was videotaped. Following a lengthy dispute about possession of the videotape, it is my understanding that Marina Oswald regained possession of it. There are no plans to make it available to researchers, but it may enter the record at some point in the future.

Some Commercial Video Sources of Oswald Footage

"Executive Action" (Warner)
Fictional film includes a variety of New Orleans and Dallas
Oswald footage.

"The Two Kennedys" (MPI)
Includes much of the WDSU footage taken in New Orleans,
as well as some of the Dallas footage.

"John F. Kennedy" (CBS)
This has appeared under various titles, and includes Oswald
Dallas footage.

"The Plot to Kill JFK: Rush to Judgment"(MPI)
includes some Dallas footage of Oswald.

"Four Days in November" (MGM/UA)
This 1964 Wolper documentary includes a variety of the Dallas
Oswald footage.

"The Men Who Killed Kennedy" (Time-Life)
Parts 1, 4 and 5 of this 5-volume set include much of the professional Oswald footage, except for the Johann Rush footage.
(UPDATE: vol. 7-8-9 were banned by the History Channel after objections and threats of lawsuits were made by the usual suspects--LBJ's widow,LBJ former aides Jack Valenti and Bill Moyers, Disney honcho Eisener, and two former Presidents --Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter.Nigle Turner has not been heard of since.).

"Films from the Sixth Floor,"
Available from the exhibit in the Book Depository, includes
much good Oswald footage in the segment "Crisis Hours," including
the rare footage of Oswald still inside the Texas Theater.

"Man Against Humanity"(Front Row)
This low-budget video includes most of the New
Orleans WDSU footage, as well as some Dallas footage.

"Declassified: The Plot to Kill President Kennedy"
an edited version of the Anthony Summers documentary, also includes
a variety of Oswald footage from New Orleans and Dallas.

"Texas News: John F. Kennedy" (Independent Historical Films)
includes Oswald Dallas footage.

"The JFK Assassination: The Jim Garrison Tapes" (Vestron)
includes a variety of New Orleans and Dallas Oswald footage.

"Who Killed JFK? Facts, not Fiction"(CBS)
includes a variety of New Orleans and Dallas footage.

"Beyond "JFK": The Question of Conspiracy"(Warner)
includes much of the New Orleans footage.

"The Assassination of JFK"(MPI)
also includes much of the New Orleans, and some Dallas footage.

Since Shackelford's list, YouTube has exploded on the scene,making much footage available, and hopefully,more to come.

JVB

THE LEE HARVEY OSWALD MEMORIAL EVENING

Trine Day is a small publishing company that dares to print books that are controversial and important. They are daring to publish ME & LEE -- the true history of Lee Harvey Oswald -- and Dr. Mary's Monkey, the eye-opening story by Edward T. Haslam of the secret labs in New Orleans where Lee and I worked.


LEE OSWALD was an innocent man. Knowing how he was framed -- and by whom-- will help you understand why America's big, beautiful dreams for humankind have been ruined by greedy, vicious people who had to kill Kennedy to get power. The Lee Harvey Oswald Memorial Evening is held every Nov. 24th, to commemorate Oswald's sacrifice for his country and to highlight how he was framed -- and why.


Want to help spread the word? Visit http://judythvarybaker.com !


THE LEE HARVEY OSWALD MEMORIAL EVENING





WE WILL LEARN MORE ABOUT LEE HARVEY OSWALD TONIGHT.
BUT WE ALSO WISH TO REMIND YOU THAT LEE HARVEY OSWALD ENDURED MANY VIOLATIONS OF HIS HUMAN RIGHTS AFTER HE WAS ARRESTED.
SUCH HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS CONTINUE TODAY.
LEARNING ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED TO LEE HARVEY OSWALD CAN HELP US UNDERSTAND HOW NOTORIOUS PRISONERS – AND ESPECIALLY POLITICAL PRISONERS – CAN BE MISTREATED.

THE LHO MEMORIAL EVENING, ALWAYS HELD ON NOVEMBER 24TH OF EACH YEAR, WILL HIGHLIGHT HOW HE WAS FRAMED -- AND WILL ALSO STRESS THE RIGHTS OF POLITICAL, CONTROVERSIAL, AND NOTORIOUS PRISONERS.

“THE ‘25’ LIST” (Choose the version you prefer from two listed here)

1) Unbiased legal representation must be provided: no arraignments without legal representation. Prisoner must know who his/her accusers are. The assigned lawyer must not have a conflict of interest in the case, must be free to investigate, must have funds to investigate, and has the right to access evidence and accusations against the client. The lawyer can be replaced at the client’s request.

(Lee was arraigned twice without a lawyer, and charged with two murders...he said on live TV that he asked someone to come forth to represent him....reporters were told tat despite Lee's several pleas for a lawyer, and telephone calls to reach a lawyer, in his private arraignments he said he didn't want a lawyer! -- even though Lee was still asking for a lawyer after that 'no lawyer wanted' statement was made to the press).

(2) Charges must be filed within 72 hours, or release must be made on reasonable bail
(no more Gitmo 'non-combatant detainee' situations). Prisoner must be made aware of all/new charges.

(3) The word 'detainee' will be prohibited if a person is arrested and then held more than 24 hours: the word 'arrest' will be used when a person is arrested and held more than 24 hours.

(4) Torture, in all forms, to be prohibited, as per Geneva Convention treaties.

(5) All interrogations shall be filmed, with adequate sound levels, and will be available, unedited and uncut, to the prisoner's selected lawyer and advisors. The press, friends, public and family have the right to view and hear (but not copy) such films; the prisoner, (or, if deceased, prisoner's family/lawyer) upon release will be given an uncensored copy of all interrogations (interrogators' faces can be shielded from view).

(6) No playing up to the public that the suspect is guilty before a fair trial.

(7) The right to immediate medical attention, to adequate and reasonable access to edible and nutritious food, potable water, etc. (During his Dallas arrest, Lee Oswald was beaten, but was given no medical care or attention...I have found only one record of his being given a meal in two days...when held in jail in New Orleans, Lee was given a tray of food with jail floor dirt and dead roaches sprinkled on top. Said Lee, smiling: “Ah! Roach a la mode!”)

(8) The right to be interrogated unbound, and unstressed (Lee was handcuffed with hands behind his back for hours, while interrogated, in his beaten condition).

(9) After being frisked and subjected to a body search, and any DNA/other tests deemed necessary, no 'evidence' 'found' later on the person of the prisoner, or on, or in, what he was wearing when arrested, will be admissible as ‘evidence’ or at a trial

(It came out in 2008, according to the officer involved, that Lee was frisked and searched when arrested at The Texas Theatre...Lee was frisked and searched again when he was booked...somehow, hours after his arrest and booking, five .38 caliber bullets were suddenly 'found' in one of Lee's pants pockets, conveniently matching the non-automatic revolver (that somehow no longer worked) 'found' on Lee in the Texas Theatre -- said to have been used to kill Dallas police officer Tippet -- though shells found at Tippet’s murder scene came from a semi-automatic weapon, not from the "Texas Theatre' weapon, which was a simple snub-nosed .38 S&W...'the' weapon of choice for off-duty Dallas policemen, at the time, to carry around. The bore of this snub-nosed revolver made it impossible to directly match bullets fired from it, but the caliber of the bullets was another matter... hence, apparently, the necessity to plant additional 'evidence' -- the .38 caliber bullets --in Lee's pants pocket...)

(9) Fair lineups conducted, with at least five similarly dressed persons of similar age and physical characteristics.
(Lee was lined up various ways that were unfair: for example, he was wearing a torn shirt, had a black eye and tousled hair, was quite thin, and was only 24...but was lined up with just three older, heavier Dallas Police employees who were wearing clean, pressed office clothing, and ties. Later, Lee was lined up with teenagers from the nearby jail, who wore jail uniforms, and obviously hadn't been in the outside world, while Lee, older than they, was presented in his white, rumpled tee-shirt, and other street ‘garb.’

Though there was room for more men to stand in the Dallas lineups -- two extra spaces could be seen in extant photos ---- only 3 people at a time stood with Lee in the various lineups, making it easier to pick him out even by chance --25%.)


(10) In all lineups, the person's name, occupation, and/or place of work is not to be mentioned to viewing witnesses.

(Lee was forced to stand forth, and give his name -- his name was in all the newspapers already -- and his workplace -- was also mentioned in the newspapers....while, in contrast, the three Dallas police department employees standing with him gave their (non-notorious) names, and their (prestigious) workplaces -- the Dallas police department -- only an idiot would think any of those three men working for the Dallas police department might have been 'the' guilty man!)

(11) Witnesses watching lineups will not be influenced by verbal or body language, or in any other way, to pick out the 'right' person in a lineup: filmed records with adequate sound will be provided to the prisoner’s lawyer and the press upon demand (witness’ faces can be obscured).

(on record for one of Lee’s lineups: a policeman asking a female witness to re-think her wrong choice and to look again at a man standing under a different number, the number named outright....she finally got the hints, and chose Oswald)

(12) Prisoners on trial or being arraigned will not be presented before the judge or placed on trial 'with a jury of peers' wearing prison garb, unusual clothing, or soiled, torn clothing, but will be dressed as would be members of a jury of peers.

(Example: until the 1980's, prison garb was not worn by those 'presumed innocent until found guilty.' Old Perry Mason TV programs show the accused person wearing ordinary street clothes, suits, etc. This is no longer the case. Prisoners attend their trials today in the US and many other countries in prison garb. Such garb constitutes a statement of prejudice against the accused. A person in an orange jump suit already looks guilty. How is he/she a 'peer'? This must change.)

(13) No prisoner is to be kept while on trial or while being interviewed by the press in a cage, or in any other humiliating or demeaning manner, such as blindfolded (though he may need to be handcuffed if deemed dangerous to others) : such practices/confinement implies guilt or danger.

(14) Photos selected for the press, or created/used by the press/anyone else must present the prisoner, whenever possible, in a neutral light. Nor should photos be retouched to create a different facial expression, skin complexion, or to distort.

(Lee’s photos were selected, in some cases, and a few altered, to make him look like he was smirking, while other photos were retouched to reduce the appearance of his having been beaten. His bruised nose, for example, was retouched in some photos, and many photos were selected showing Lee at unattractive angles...Some photos were flipped, enhancing Lee’s swollen black eye as if it was his right eye (facing the viewer) --- which was probably hit by a left-handed policeman. However, Lee was actually struck by a right-handed policeman in the left eye. The policeman in question said he, the policeman, was holding a revolver when he approached Lee in the Texas Theater. Next, he says he reached down and grabbed Lee’s revolver. How could he have put away his own revolver? To grab it, he had to have a free hand. A flipped photo could solve that problem, or perhaps it as a coincidence. During the ‘midnight press conference,’ when Lee was televised live, and photos could not be retouched, Lee Oswald looked surprisingly attractive, wasn't 'smirking' and presented an attitude that wasn't 'cocky' -- unlike the impression given by photos ).

(15) A prisoner is to have access to friends, lawyers, legal help, family and press without being subjected to drugs, threats, or stressful/humiliating conditions. A prisoner who is married and/or has children of any age can have direct physical access to these persons, if the marriage partner and/or children request it.

(16) A reputable doctor, whose name must be available, will certify that the prisoner has not been drugged, or threatened, before all public meetings, or after them, and that all the prisoner's medical problems have been adequately addressed (example, if a prisoner needs dialysis, he will not be denied dialysis, nor will it be delayed, nor will the prisoner's interviews be delayed on any such excuses). The prisoner’s uncensored medical records will be available to other reputable physicians at the request of the prisoner or his lawyer for examination.

(17) The prisoner will be held/jailed in the same country, and, when possible, in the same geographical area, as friends, family, and counsel are located, unless a state of war or martial law exists.

(18) Trial dates cannot be changed within 5 days before trial date (persons/witnesses buying travel tickets have been financially stressed by frequent trial date changes, helping to guarantee that certain people cannot reach trial site) unless the prisoner/judge, other highly important person has become certifiably ill, has died, or is now incompetent.

(19) Prison guards/personnel must eat the same food, and drink the same water, as their prisoners, with the same frequency/accessibility, and with the same serving sizes/number of refills as all prisoners.

(20) Prison guards must be clothed at the same level of comfort as all prisoners (if coats are needed, due to cold, all prisoners must have suitable coats). If prison officials need to use fans or air conditioning in their offices, prisoners must have fan circulation, and/or air conditioning, too. Light levels, and how long lights are on or off, must be the same for all prisoners, prison guards, and daytime-open prison offices.

(21) Religious rights, access to religious rites and religious clerics, and access to uncensored religious holy books will be provided all prisoners. Holy books/items reverenced by the prisoner will be respected.

(22) Prisoners will have the right to make out legal wills created in the presence of a lawyer of their choice. The process of writing and accepting the will must be recorded on film, with audio and such recordings must be given to friends/family/others mentioned in the wills, with true text copies of the will.

(23) Prisoners will have the right to natural sunlight, adequate and clean shelter, adequate bedding and bedding materials, toilet -and- wash access in cells, and regular exercise opportunities.

(24) Prisoners will not be kept in solitary confinement without access to regular non-threatening human contact, including the right to meet weekly with friends, family, the press, and requested lawyers for up to 70 minutes (10m rule). Prisoners kept in solitary must have full TV, phone call, and library privileges.

(25) No prisoner will be subjected to 'cruel or unusual punishment.'



Revised:
LHO MEMORIAL EVENING -- Nov. 24 --- WILL STRESS PROTECTION
OF THE RIGHTS OF POLITICAL, CONTROVERSIAL,
AND NOTORIOUS PRISONERS

“THE ‘25’ LIST”

1) Unbiased legal representation must be provided: no arraignments without unbiased legal representation. Prisoner must know who his/her accusers are. The assigned lawyer must not have a conflict of interest in the case, must be free to investigate, must have funds to investigate, and has the right to access evidence and accusations against the client. The lawyer can be replaced at the client’s request.

(Lee was arraigned twice without a lawyer, and each time charged with a murder. But on live TV he had asked for someone to come forth to represent him. Reporters were told that despite Lee's public pleas for a lawyer (and his telephone calls attempting to reach a lawyer), his accusers said he only wanted a certain lawyer who could not be reached. We know that Lee Oswald asked Ruth Paine to contact a lawyer for him, and that she refused to do so. We know that a telephone operator went on record saying she was told to disconnect another telephone call Lee Oswald made, trying to reach someone else he hoped would help him. She disconnected the call.)

(2) An arrested person shall not be held without charges. Charges must be filed within 72 hours, or release must be made, assessing reasonable bail (no more Gitmo 'non-combatant detainee' situations). Prisoner and his legal counsel must be made aware of all/any new charges.

(3) The word 'detainee' will be prohibited if a person is arrested and then held more than 24 hours: the word 'arrest' will be used when a person is arrested and held more than 24 hours. (euphemisms, in "1984" style "Newspeak" style -- such as avoiding the word 'torture' when torture is involved, must be discarded.)

(4) Torture, in all forms, and by all names, is prohibited, as per Geneva Convention treaties.

(5) Interrogations will be filmed, with adequate sound levels, and will be available, unedited and uncut, to the prisoner's legal counsel and advisors. The press, friends, public and family have the right to view and hear such films.

(6) No playing up to the public that the suspect is guilty before a fair trial. A suspect will not be treated as guilty and will not be described to the public or to officials as guilty until proven guilty by fair trial.

(The public was told that Lee Oswald "without any doubt" was the guilty and only gunman by Dallas police, while he was yet alive -- Oswald was shot only two days after his arrest by nightclub owner and Mafia police-fixer, Jack Ruby. J. Edgar Hoover, head of the FBI, told President Johnson that Lee Oswald was the sole gunman the first day of his arrest. The FBI issued a statement that Lee Oswald was the guilty man the first day of his arrest.)

(7) The right to immediate medical attention, to adequate and reasonable access to edible and nutritious food, potable water, etc. (During his Dallas arrest, Lee Oswald was beaten, but was given no medical care or attention. The record shows that Oswald, though he had a black eye, facial cuts, and damage to his nose -- we do not know how the body blows he received bothered him --- was given scant time to rest, eat or sleep those last two days of his life, while under arrest. Oswald made complaints that he was not allowed to change his (torn and dirty ) clothing, to shave, or to wash. JVB was told that when Oswald was held overnight in jail in New Orleans, in August, 1963, he was given a tray of food with jail floor dirt and dead roaches sprinkled on top. Said Oswald, smiling: “Ah! Roach a la mode!”)

(8) The right to be interrogated unbound, and unstressed (Oswald was handcuffed with hands behind his back for hours, while interrogated, in his beaten and exhausted condition).

(9) After being frisked and subjected to a body search, and any DNA/other tests deemed necessary, no 'evidence' 'found' later on the person of the prisoner, or associated with what the prisoner was wearing when arrested, will be admissible as ‘evidence’ or at a trial.

(It came out in 2007-2008, according to the officer involved, that Oswald was frisked and searched immediately upon his arrest at The Texas Theatre. He was frisked and searched again when he was booked. Yet, hours after his arrest and booking, several bullets were suddenly 'found' in one of his pants pockets, conveniently matching the non-automatic revolver (that somehow no longer worked) 'found' on him at the Texas Theatre -- said to have been used to kill Dallas police officer Tippet -- though some shells at Tippet’s murder scene came from a semi-automatic weapon, not from the "Texas Theatre" weapon, which was a simple snub-nosed .38 S&W...'the' weapon of choice for off-duty Dallas policemen, at the time, to carry around. The large bore of this snub-nosed revolver made it impossible to directly match bullets fired from it, but the caliber of the bullets was another matter... hence, apparently, the necessity to plant additional 'evidence' of the correct caliber in Oswald's pants pocket.

(9) Fair lineups conducted, with at least five similarly dressed persons of similar age and physical characteristics.

(Oswald was lined up various ways that were unfair: for example, he was wearing a torn shirt, had a black eye and tousled hair, was quite thin, and was only 24...but was lined up with just three older, heavier Dallas Police Department employees wearing clean, pressed office clothing and neckties. Later, Lee was lined up with teenagers from the nearby jail, who wore jail uniforms, and obviously hadn't been in the outside world, while Lee, older than they, was presented in his white, rumpled tee-shirt, and unshaven.

Though there was room for more men to stand in the Dallas lineups -- extra spaces could be seen in extant photos ---- only 3 people at a time stood with Lee in at least two lineups, making it easier to pick him out even by chance --25%.)


(10) In all lineups, the person's name, age, occupation, and/or place of work is not to be mentioned to viewing witnesses.

(Lee was forced to stand forth, and give his name -- the same name that was in the newspapers already -- and his workplace -- also mentioned in the newspapers....while, in contrast, the three Dallas Police Department employees standing with him gave their (non-notorious) names, and their (prestigious) workplaces. Only a moron would think any of those three men working for the Dallas police department might have been 'the' guilty man.)

(11) Witnesses watching lineups will not be influenced by verbal or body language, or in any other way, to pick out the 'right' person in a lineup: filmed records with adequate sound will be provided to the prisoner’s lawyer and the press upon demand (witness’ faces can be obscured).

(On record for one of Oswald's lineups: a policeman asking a female witness to re-think her wrong choice and to look again at a different man -- a man standing under a different number from the number she'd chosen --- she finally got the hints, and chose Oswald.)

(12) Prisoners on trial or being arraigned will not be presented before the judge or placed on trial 'with a jury of peers' wearing prison garb, unusual clothing, or soiled, torn clothing, but will be dressed as would be members of a jury of peers.

(Example: until the 1980's, prison garb was not worn by those 'presumed innocent until found guilty.' Old Perry Mason TV programs, for example, show accused persons wearing ordinary street clothes, suits, etc. This is often no longer the case. Prisoners often attend their trials today in the US and many other countries weqaring garish prison garb. Such a costume constitutes a statement of prejudice against the accused. A person in an orange jump suit already looks guilty. How is he/she a 'peer'? This must change.)

(13) No prisoner is to be kept, while on trial or while being interviewed by the press, in a cage, or in any other humiliating or demeaning manner, such as blindfolded (though he may need to be handcuffed if deemed dangerous to others) : such practices/confinement implies guilt or that the person is dangerous or notorious).

(14) Photos selected for the press, or created/used by the press/anyone else must present the prisoner, whenever possible, in a neutral light. Nor should photos be retouched to create a different facial expression, skin complexion, or to otherwise distort.

(Oswald’s photos were selected, in some cases, to make him look like he was smirking, while other photos were retouched to make the 'smirk' more noticeable. Some photos were retouched to reduce the appearance of his having been beaten. His bruised nose, for example, was retouched in some photos, and many photos were selected showing him at unattractive angles...Some photos were flipped, During the ‘midnight press conference,’ when Oswald was televised live, and in live hallway TV photos, which could not be retouched, Lee Oswald looked surprisingly attractive, wasn't 'smirking' and presented an attitude that wasn't 'cocky' -- unlike the impression given by selected photos ).

(15) A prisoner will have access to friends, lawyers, legal help, family and press without being subjected to drugs, threats, stressful/humiliating conditions etc. A prisoner who is married and/or has children of any age should have direct physical access to these persons, if the marriage partner and/or children request it. The increasingly stringent requirement to not allow touch between the accused and loved ones is cruel and unjustifiable.

(16) A reputable doctor, whose name and credentials must be available for nspection, will certify that the prisoner has not been drugged, or threatened, before and after all public meetings, or interrogations, and that all the prisoner's medical problems have been adequately addressed (example, if a prisoner needs dialysis, he will not be denied dialysis, nor will it be delayed). The prisoner’s uncensored medical records will be available to other reputable physicians, at the request of the prisoner or his lawyer, for examination. The prisoner has the right to a second medical opinion via a private physician of choice.

(17) The prisoner will be held/jailed in the same country, and, when possible, in the same geographical area, as friends, family, and counsel are located, unless a state of war or martial law exists.

(18) Trial dates cannot be changed within 5 days before trial date unless proven unmitigable circumstances or health problems occur for: prisoner and/or judge and/or prisoner's legal counsel (persons/witnesses buying travel tickets have been financially stressed by frequent trial date changes, helping to guarantee that certain people cannot reach the trial site) .

(19) Private companies will not run prisons, since certain prisoner comforts, needs, and rights can be ignored in favor of higher profits. Wherever prisoners are held more than 30 days, prison guards/personnel must eat the same food, and drink the same water, as their prisoners, with the same frequency/accessibility, and with the same serving sizes/number of refills as all prisoners.

(20) Private companies will not run prisons, since certain prisoner comforts, needs, and rights can be ignored in favor of higher profits. Wherever prisoners are held more than 30 days, Prison guards must be clothed at the same level of comfort as all prisoners (if coats are needed, due to cold, all prisoners must have suitable coats). If prison officials need to use fans or air conditioning in their offices, prisoners must have the same fan circulation, and/or air conditioning, too. Light levels, and how long lights are on or off, must be the same for all prisoners, prison guards, and daytime-open prison offices.

(21) Religious rights, access to religious rites and religious clerics, and access to uncensored religious holy books in good condition will be provided all prisoners upon request. Holy books/items reverenced by the prisoner will be respected.

(22) Prisoners will have the right to make out legal wills created in the presence of a lawyer of their choice. The process of writing and accepting the will must be recorded on film, with audio, and copies of such recordings and records must be given to friends/family/others mentioned in the wills, including true text copies of the will.

(23) Prisoners will have the right to natural sunlight, adequate and clean shelter, adequate bedding and bedding materials, toilet -and- wash access in cells, social contact with other prisoners, insofar as is safely possible, and regular exercise opportunities.

(24) Prisoners will not be kept in solitary confinement without access to regular non-threatening human contact, including the right to call and/or meet weekly with any of the following: friends, family, the press, requested lawyers, physicians, for up to 70 minutes (10m/day rule). Prisoners kept in solitary must have TV and library privileges.

(25) No prisoner will be subjected to 'cruel or unusual punishment.'

JOIN THIS FACEBOOK CAUSE! Defending and Vindicating Lee Harvey Oswald--Patsy, Hero and Patriot

JOIN THIS FACEBOOK CAUSE!
Defending and Vindicating Lee Harvey Oswald -- Patsy, Hero and Patriot
Oswald was framed. Accused of shooting JFK, then murdered, our sold-out media trumpets the "Official Version." New witnesses and evidence is ignored. The eye-opening truth MUST be defended! Edit
Positions:
Lee Harvey Oswald, accused of shooting Kennedy, was actually an innocent man used as a patsy. A new government came into power through a Coup.
Oswald, who admired Herbert Philbrick (FBI double agent) worked for our government and served as a spy in the USSR. This made it easy to frame him.
Oswald then was silenced 48 hours later because he knew too much. His killer's ties to Mafia were hidden for years. Planted evidence fooled us.
The government 'proved' 'only' Oswald was guilty and never looked elsewhere. We are still told Oswald was the 'only' gunman. New evidence is ignored.
New witnesses are quashed, lied about, persecuted, and threatened. Here, they -- and Oswald -- will have a voice.
When President John Kennedy was shot, in 1963, the US entered a different kind of government system, starting with aTexas President and including more two Presidents from Texas after that, who dragged the US into three wars, killing millions, and changing America into a more violent nation. Kennedy opposed the Vietnam War and the military-industrial complex that benefited from it. JFK was murdered in Texas and Lee Harvey Oswald was framed as 'sole assassin' within a few hours, and made to take the blame. Then, 48 hours after his arrest, he was shot by a Mafia henchman. Today we know the CIA and Mafia worked together in assasinations at that time. The CIA admitted it in 2008. Even today, media and Wikipedia present ONLY the "official" version, ignoring new evidence and new witnesses as to Oswald's innocence, thereby protecting those leaders and secret agencies who allowed JFK to be killed so they could have their wars and promote their form of government. Only recently do we have hope that the truth will out, and that Oswald -- actually a patriot -- will be exonerated and vindicated, with the ARRB and new witnesses and evidence proving Oswald was actually working for the US government, as well as the fact that he tried to warn the FBI and secret service that the President might be killed. For this, he had to die. Your help will help promote peace and expose the injustice done to Oswald and all Americans -- as well as to innocent people worldwide affected by US war policies ever since --when the Coup d'Etat took place (which of course, being investigated by the government that benefited, would never --and can never allow anyone but Oswald to take the blame). Your membership and support will help us protect, preserve and expose the truth -- and help America to become a more peaceful nation, as those who were in powerr --and their heirs-- are exposed for who they were. We must act now, while witnesses are still alive, before history is rewritten forever, blaming an innocent man who actually loved his country and admired JFK, while allowing the rea killers to govern America without being identified or punished. We will see how long this Cause s allowed to exist! That will be a gauge as to how much freedom of speech actually remains in America, and in the Free World.

visit judythvarybaker.com to view information about Oswald
visit Edward T. Haslam's website: Dr. Mary's Monkey
visit Trine Day Publishers' website to view other books of interest
JOIN THIS FACEBOOK CAUSE TODAY!